Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3

8Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To extend the utility of ligand 3D shape similarity into pose prediction and virtual screening, we have previously developed CDVS and PoPSS methods. Both of them utilize ligand 3D shape similarity with the crystallographic ligands to improve pose prediction. While CDVS utilizes shape similarity to select suitable receptor structures for molecular docking, PoPSS places a ligand conformation of the highest shape similarity with crystal ligands into the target protein binding pocket which is then refined by side-chain repacking and Monte Carlo energy minimization. Analyses of PoPSS revealed some drawbacks in ligand conformation generation and the scoring scheme used. Moreover, as PoPSS does not sample the ligand conformation after placing it in the binding pocket, it relies solely on conformation generation methods to produce native like conformations. To address these limitations of PoPSS method, we report here a modified approach named as PoPSS-Lite, where side-chain repacking was replaced by a simple grid-based energy minimization. This modification also allowed the sampling of terminal functional groups while keeping the core scaffold fixed. Furthermore, shape similarity calculations were improved by increasing the number of ligand conformations and using a different similarity metric. The performance of PoPSS-Lite was prospectively evaluated in D3R GC3. Comparison of PoPSS-Lite demonstrated superior performance over PoPSS and CDVS with lower mean and median RMSDs. Furthermore, comparison with other D3R GC3 pose prediction submissions revealed top performance for PoPSS-Lite. Our D3R GC3 result extends our perspective that ligand 3D shape similarity with known crystallographic information can be successfully used to predict the binding pose of ligands with unknown binding modes. Our D3R GC3 results further highlight the necessity for improvement in conformer generation methods in order to improve shape similarity guided pose prediction. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

References Powered by Scopus

The Protein Data Bank

32223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments

10497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Glide: A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy

7914Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

FitDock: protein–ligand docking by template fitting

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

D3R grand challenge 4: blind prediction of protein–ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring fragment-based target-specific ranking protocol with machine learning on cathepsin S

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kumar, A., & Zhang, K. Y. J. (2019). Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 33(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-018-0142-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

54%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 6

46%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

23%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free