Contradictions and consensus-clusters of opinions on E-books

38Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Q methodology was used to determine attitudes and opinions about ebooks among a group of faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates at Miami University of Ohio. Oral interviews formed the basis for a collection of opinion statements concerning e-books versus print. These statements were then ranked by a second group of research participants. Factor analysis of these rankings found four distinct factors that reveal clusters of opinions on e-books: Book Lovers, Technophiles, Pragmatists, and Printers. Two of the four factors take a more ideological approach in their understanding of e-books: Book Lovers have an emotional attachment to the printed book as an object, while Technophiles feel just as strongly about technology. In contrast, the other two factors are more utilitarian: Printers might find e-books more palatable if usability were improved, while Pragmatists are comfortable with both print and e-book formats.

References Powered by Scopus

E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electronic book usage: A survey at the University of Denver

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What do faculty and students really think about e-books?

118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Student reading practices in print and electronic media

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An integrated adoption model for e-books in a mobile environment: Evidence from South Korea

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How e-books are used: A literature review of the e-book studies conducted from 2006 to 2011

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shrimplin, A. K., Revelle, A., Hurst, S., & Messner, K. (2011). Contradictions and consensus-clusters of opinions on E-books. College and Research Libraries, 72(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-108rl

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

15%

Researcher 4

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 25

51%

Computer Science 12

24%

Arts and Humanities 9

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0