Assessing first-order BQART estimates for ancient source-to-sink mass budget calculations

15Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Constraining the timing and volume of sediment dispersal in an ancient sedimentary system is vital to understand a basin's infill history. One preferred method for a first-order approximation of ancient sediment load estimates, the BQART model, is based on empirical observations of modern river systems relating basin morphology, topography, climate, run-off and bedrock characteristics. Despite the popularity of such methods, a comprehensive assessment on the validity of using modern river observations to measure sediment load on geological timescales is lacking. Here, we investigate the uncertainties, sensitivities and practicalities surrounding the use of modern empirical observations in general and the BQART model in particular, to evaluate ancient sediment river loads. Although catchment area and relief are the least constrained parameters in an ancient sedimentary system, the temperature parameter may have an even more significant impact in the range of predicted sediment load estimates using a BQART approach. The applicability of BQART is most suitable for regional to continental scale source-to-sink systems that are based on robust paleogeographic and paleoclimatic models of cold (<2°C) or warm temperate (>8°C) climates. One further needs to consider the high amplitude discharge events that can dominate the stratigraphic record which are not captured by historical observations of sediment load over a 30-year period. In addition, our limited understanding of bedload material transport and an unknown pristine environment in the Anthropocene reduce the reliability of modern sediment load estimates for the ancient. Mass budget estimates in deep time based on empirical relationships of modern river systems can thus provide first-order estimates within an order of magnitude but need to consider the limitations imposed by extrapolating the modern to the ancient. Here, we present a framework to consider the suitability of the BQART method for ancient source-to-sink mass budget analyses.

References Powered by Scopus

World-wide delivery of sediment to the oceans.

3127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers

3021Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interpreting provenance relations from detrital modes of sandstones.

1541Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Linking sediment supply variations and tectonic evolution in deep time, source-to-sink systems—The Triassic Greater Barents Sea Basin

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Provenance and evolution of East Asian large rivers recorded in the East and South China Seas: A review

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Arctic sediment routing during the Triassic: sinking the Arctic Atlantis

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nyberg, B., Helland-Hansen, W., Gawthorpe, R., Tillmans, F., & Sandbakken, P. (2021). Assessing first-order BQART estimates for ancient source-to-sink mass budget calculations. Basin Research, 33(4), 2435–2452. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12563

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Researcher 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 8

73%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Environmental Science 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0