Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs

  • Concato J
  • Shah N
  • Horwitz R
2.9kCitations
Citations of this article
857Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND In the hierarchy of research designs, the results of randomized, controlled trials are considered to be evidence of the highest grade, whereas observational studies are viewed as having less validity because they reportedly overestimate treatment effects. We used published meta-analyses to identify randomized clinical trials and observational studies that examined the same clinical topics. We then compared the results of the original reports according to the type of research design. METHODS A search of the Medline data base for articles published in five major medical journals from 1991 to 1995 identified meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses of either cohort or case-control studies that assessed the same intervention. For each of five topics, summary estimates and 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated on the basis of data from the individual randomized, controlled trials and the individual observational studies. RESULTS For the five clinical topics and 99 reports evaluated, the average results of the observational studies were remarkably similar to those of the randomized, controlled trials. For example, analysis of 13 randomized, controlled trials of the effectiveness of bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine in preventing active tuberculosis yielded a relative risk of 0.49 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.70) among vaccinated patients, as compared with an odds ratio of 0.50 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.65) from 10 case-control studies. In addition, the range of the point estimates for the effect of vaccination was wider for the randomized, controlled trials (0.20 to 1.56) than for the observational studies (0.17 to 0.84). CONCLUSIONS The results of well-designed observational studies (with either a cohort or a case-control design) do not systematically overestimate the magnitude of the effects of treatment as compared with those in randomized, controlled trials on the same topic.

References Powered by Scopus

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32921Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Empirical Evidence of Bias: Dimensions of Methodological Quality Associated With Estimates of Treatment Effects in Controlled Trials

5460Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias

4026Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: An observational study

4026Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration

3219Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies

2020Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Concato, J., Shah, N., & Horwitz, R. I. (2000). Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(25), 1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200006223422507

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240306090120

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 366

64%

Researcher 108

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 69

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 30

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 344

71%

Nursing and Health Professions 51

10%

Social Sciences 48

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 5
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 11

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0