Changes in neural activity underlying working memory after computerized cognitive training in older adults

24Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Computerized cognitive training (CCT) may counter the impact of aging on cognition, but both the efficacy and neurocognitive mechanisms underlying CCT remain controversial. In this study, 35 older individuals were randomly assigned to Cogmed adaptive working memory (WM) CCT or an active control CCT, featuring five weeks of five ~40 min sessions per week. Before and after the 5-week intervention, event-related potentials were measured while subjects completed a visual n-back task with three levels of demand (0-back, 1-back, 2-back). The anterior P3a served as an index of directing attention and the posterior P3b as an index of categorization/WM updating. We hypothesized that adaptive CCT would be associated with decreased P3 amplitude at low WM demand and increased P3 amplitude at high WM demand. The adaptive CCT group exhibited a training-related increase in the amplitude of the anterior P3a and posterior P3b in response to target stimuli across n-back tasks, while subjects in the active control CCT group demonstrated a post-training decrease in the anterior P3a. Performance did not differ between groups or sessions. Larger overall P3 amplitudes were strongly associated with better task performance. Increased post-CCT P3 amplitude correlated with improved task performance; this relationship was especially robust at high task load. Our findings suggest that adaptive WM training was associated with increased orienting of attention, as indexed by the P3a, and the enhancement of categorization/WM updating processes, as indexed by the P3b. Increased P3 amplitude was linked to improved performance; however. there was no direct association between adaptive training and improved performance.

Figures

  • FIGURE 1 | Hypothetical task-demand/resource utilization curves. (A) Downward shift of hypothetical task demand-activation curve. (B) Upward shift of hypothetical task demand-activation curve. (C) Rightward shift of hypothetical task demand-activation curve.
  • FIGURE 2 | Subject flow chart.
  • FIGURE 3 | N-Back task illustration.
  • FIGURE 4 | Electrode montage with regions of interest (ROIs) highlighted.
  • TABLE 1 | Pre-CCT demographic variables and neuropsychological percentile scores.
  • FIGURE 5 | Average waveforms plotted at Pz ROI.
  • FIGURE 6 | Topographic scalp plots of P3 mean amplitude.
  • TABLE 2 | Average waveforms − 2 Session × 3 N-Back × 5 Electrode Site × 2 CCT Group ANOVA − Main Effects and Interactions.

References Powered by Scopus

"Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician

77974Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis

17880Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome

7869Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cognitive and neural plasticity in old age: A systematic review of evidence from executive functions cognitive training

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interventional programmes to improve cognition during healthy and pathological ageing: Cortical modulations and evidence for brain plasticity

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Open- and closed-skill exercise interventions produce different neurocognitive effects on executive functions in the elderly: A 6-Month randomized, controlled trial

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tusch, E. S., Alperin, B. R., Ryan, E., Holcomb, P. J., Mohammed, A. H., & Daffner, K. R. (2016). Changes in neural activity underlying working memory after computerized cognitive training in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8(NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00255

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

67%

Researcher 12

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 29

54%

Neuroscience 17

31%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

7%

Social Sciences 4

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 19

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0