Changes in quality of life and health status in patients with extracorporeal life support: A prospective longitudinal study

16Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) provides emergency pulmonary and cardiac assistance for patients in respiratory or cardiac failure. Most studies evaluate the success of ECLS based on patients’ survival rate. However, the trajectory of health status and quality of life (QOL) should also be important considerations. The study’s aim was to explore changes in health status and QOL in adult patients weaned from ECLS who survived to hospital discharge over a one-year period. Study design A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from April 2012 to September 2014. A convenience sample of patients who had undergone ECLS was followed for one-year after hospital discharge. Heath status was measured with a physical activity scale, the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, and a social support scale; we assessed quality of life with the physical and mental component summary scales of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey. Changes in depression, social support, physical activity and QOL were analysed with generalized estimating equations at 3-month intervals; participants’ QOL at 12 months after discharge was compared with the general population. Results A total of 231 patients received ECLS during the study period. Sixty-five patients survived to hospital discharge (28% survival rate); 32 participants completed the study. Data showed scores for physical activity increased significantly over time (p < .001), while depression and social support significantly decreased (p < .05 and p < .001, respectively). Participants with veno-venous ECLS had higher scores for depression than participants with veno-arterial ECLS (p < .05). PCS scores significantly increased at 9, and 12 months after discharge (p < .05 and p < .001, respectively). There was no significant change in MCS scores. Conclusions This was a preliminary study of patients with ECLS following hospital discharge over a one-year period. One year following hospital discharge survivors of ECLS continued to experience physical complications and some continued to have depressive symptoms; the level of social support was significantly lower after hospital discharge. Healthcare professionals should understand the trajectory of health status and QOL after discharge, which can help developing evidence-based interventions and improve QOL for survivors of ECLS.

References Powered by Scopus

The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

45658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs

5674Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

2807Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Limb ischemia in peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A narrative review of incidence, prevention, monitoring, and treatment

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007–2017-insights from a national registry

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term health-related quality of life of adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): An integrative review

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, K. H., Chen, Y. T., Yeh, S. L., Weng, L. C., & Tsai, F. C. (2018). Changes in quality of life and health status in patients with extracorporeal life support: A prospective longitudinal study. PLoS ONE, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196778

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

83%

Researcher 2

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 11

48%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

35%

Social Sciences 2

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free