Personalising clinical pathways in a London breast cancer service

6Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Using interview and observational data from a busy and research-intensive breast cancer service in the United Kingdom, we discuss recent developments in personalised medicine. Specifically, we show how clinical and research practices meet in clinical pathways that are reconfigured in response to changing approaches of diagnosing, monitoring, treating and understanding cancers. Clinical pathways are increasingly sensitive to changes in evidence deduced through new technologies and therapies as well as decisions based on intensive, iterative analysis of data collected across a range of platforms. We contribute to existing research by showing how the organisation of clinical pathways both maintains established clinical practices and responds to new research evidence, managing a threshold between evidence-based and experimental medicine. Finally, we invite comparisons with other forms of personalisation to understand how they depend on the ‘real time’ collection, analysis and application of data.

References Powered by Scopus

Standardization in Action: Achieving Local Universality through Medical Protocols

440Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical pathways: Effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs

346Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Personalized detection of circulating tumor DNA antedates breast cancer metastatic recurrence

330Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Unsettling the treatment imperative? Chemotherapy decision-making in the wake of genomic techniques

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Parklife and the public: 40 years of personalization in the United Kingdom

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Figuring Molecular Relapse in Breast Cancer Medicine

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Viney, W., Day, S., Bruton, J., Gleason, K., Ion, C., Nazir, S., & Ward, H. (2022). Personalising clinical pathways in a London breast cancer service. Sociology of Health and Illness, 44(3), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13441

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

50%

Social Sciences 2

25%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free