Evaluation of local descriptors and deep CNN features for face anti spoofing

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recently facial recognition Technology are being habitual for various access control requirements and spoof detection in such a system has drawn growing attention. In this paper, we represent by comparison analysis of different local descriptors and off the shelf deep networks for feature extraction- Local Binary Pattern (LBP), SIFT, Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), Shallow CNN, VGG16 and Inception-Resnet-V2 for face spoofing detection. Furthermore, we evaluated three Classifiers-Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) over the feature extracted through local descriptors and deep networks. The evaluation has been conducted using publicly available YALE face database containing real and fake facial images. Real dataset consists of 5121 entries and fake dataset has 7508 images. The analysis results demonstrate that the best prediction accuracy of real and spoof is obtained with Inception_ResnetV2 features when classified with ANN and about 96.23% accuracy is achieved.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

46305Citations
8786Readers

This article is free to access.

Going deeper with convolutions

40113Citations
23342Readers
Get full text

Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection

30666Citations
18101Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Abbreviation view of face presentation attack techniques

0Citations
7Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Priya, S., Pawar, S., & Joshi, A. (2019). Evaluation of local descriptors and deep CNN features for face anti spoofing. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 8), 1644–1648. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1121.0882S819

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

67%

Engineering 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0