Three-Dimensional reconstruction of the bony nasolacrimal canal by automated segmentation of computed tomography images

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To apply a fully automated method to quantify the 3D structure of the bony nasolacrimal canal (NLC) from CT scans whereby the size and main morphometric characteristics of the canal can be determined. Design Cross-sectional study. Subjects 36 eyes of 18 healthy individuals. Methods Using software designed to detect the boundaries of the NLC on CT images, 36 NLC reconstructions were prepared. These reconstructions were then used to calculate NLC volume. The NLC axis in each case was determined according to a polygonal model and to 2 2dn,3 rd and 4th degree polynomials. From these models, NLC sectional areas and length were determined. For each variable, descriptive statistics and normality tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk) were established. Main Outcome Measures Time for segmentation, NLC volume, axis, sectional areas and length. Results Mean processing time was around 30 seconds for segmenting each canal. All the variables generated were normally distributed. Measurements obtained using the four models polygonal, 2nd ,3rd and 4th degree polynomial, respectively, were: Mean canal length 14.74, 14.3, 14.80, and 15.03 mm; mean sectional area 15.15, 11.77, 11.43, and 11.56 mm2 ; minimum sectional area 8.69, 7.62, 7.40, and 7.19 mm2 ; and mean depth of minimum sectional area (craniocaudal) 7.85, 7.71, 8.19, and 8.08 mm. Conclusion The method proposed automatically reconstructs the NLC on CT scans. Using these reconstructions, morphometric measurements can be calculated from NLC axis estimates based on polygonal and 2nd ,3rd and 4th polynomial models.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Different evaluations of NLC length: axial (dotted red line), end-to-end (dashed green line) and true (continuous blue line).
  • Fig 2. Depiction of the four methods to compute NLC length: axial, end-to-end, polygonal, polynomial.
  • Fig 3. Segmentation results for slice 57 of subject #27 showing above the masks obtained by automatic segmentation for left and right NLC and below the contours of the segmented left and right NLC superimposed to CT slice.
  • Fig 4. Fit to data of 3rd degree polynomial model (right NLC of subject #20). a) Polynomial model of the NLC axis. b) Sagittal projection. c) Coronal projection.
  • Table 1. Polynomial models for the right NLCs of six subjects selected at random.
  • Fig 5. Surface and axis models of NLCs: oblique and overhead views (subject #17).
  • Table 2. Descriptive data for NLC lengthmeasurements.
  • Table 3. Descriptive data for the NLC sectional area measurements.

References Powered by Scopus

An anatomical basis for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sex and age differences in the bony nasolacrimal canal: An anatomical study

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CT-anatomy of the nasolacrimal sac and duct

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

3D morphological classification of the nasolacrimal duct: Anatomical study for planning treatment of tear drainage obstruction

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic Segmentation of the Nasolacrimal Canal: Application of the nnU-Net v2 Model in CBCT Imaging

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biometric characteristics of the lacrimal passages in healthy individuals and in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jañez-Garcia, L., Saenz-Frances, F., Ramirez-Sebastian, J. M., Toledano-Fernandez, N., Urbasos-Pascual, M., & Jañez-Escalada, L. (2016). Three-Dimensional reconstruction of the bony nasolacrimal canal by automated segmentation of computed tomography images. PLoS ONE, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155436

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘2002468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

57%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 20

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0