2D Hypersonic Scramjet Inlet Geometry of Mach 7 using CFD

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the era of space transportations there is a huge demand on space technology to improve on cost reduction and take the heavy loads into space. Thus the load carrying capacities will be increase with this air breathing engines. This work gives a report on the design, analysis of optimal 2D scramjet engine inlet operating at Mach 7 without use of movable geometry. A computational study for scramjet inlet with different ramp angles is carried out. Several cases are considered to compress the air by rounding leading edge without moving the whole cowl up and down, by fixing the cowl lip and assuming axisymmetric inlet with rounded edge. The numerical tests are conducted to obtain maximum total pressure recovery, drag force and outlet Mach number for given flight condition. Two dimensional effects are studied with Navier-strokes approach to compute the pressure and Mach number at a different location. Oblique shock waves, expansion waves and shock wave interactions are primarily focused. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver is used; steady flow simulations are carried out for inlet geometries with one, two, three and four ramps. Geometrical shape is redesigned based on oblique shock wave analysis. The corrected model is tested on Fluent with boundary layer considerations that the theoretical analysis is not able to cover. Lastly, a conclusion summarizing the design process is drawn and the optimal model is recommended for the Mach 7 inlet with different ramps with contraction ratio 10. It had been observed that two ramp scramjet inlet model has been preferred to use which has optimum pressure recovery and lower drag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pagilla, N. K., Bhaskar, S. vijaya, & Reddy, P. N. (2019). 2D Hypersonic Scramjet Inlet Geometry of Mach 7 using CFD. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(2), 5419–5422. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.b2343.129219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free