Glacier topography and elevation changes derived from Pléiades sub-meter stereo images

172Citations
Citations of this article
196Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In response to climate change, most glaciers are losing mass and hence contribute to sea-level rise. Repeated and accurate mapping of their surface topography is required to estimate their mass balance and to extrapolate/calibrate sparse field glaciological measurements. In this study we evaluate the potential of sub-meter stereo imagery from the recently launched Pléiades satellites to derive digital elevation models (DEMs) of glaciers and their elevation changes. Our five evaluation sites, where nearly simultaneous field measurements were collected, are located in Iceland, the European Alps, the central Andes, Nepal and Antarctica. For Iceland, the Pléiades DEM is also compared to a lidar DEM. The vertical biases of the Pléiades DEMs are less than 1m if ground control points (GCPs) are used, but reach up to 7m without GCPs. Even without GCPs, vertical biases can be reduced to a few decimetres by horizontal and vertical co-registration of the DEMs to reference altimetric data on ice-free terrain. Around these biases, the vertical precision of the Pléiades DEMs is ±1m and even ±0.5m on the flat glacier tongues (1σ confidence level). Similar precision levels are obtained in the accumulation areas of glaciers and in Antarctica. We also demonstrate the high potential of Pléiades DEMs for measuring seasonal, annual and multiannual elevation changes with an accuracy of 1m or better if cloud-free images are available. The negative region-wide mass balances of glaciers in the Mont-Blanc area (-1.04 ± 0.23ma-1 water equivalent, w.e.) are revealed by differencing Satellite pour l'Observation de la Terre 5 (SPOT 5) and Pléiades DEMs acquired in August 2003 and 2012, confirming the accelerated glacial wastage in the European Alps.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Study sites where Pléiades stereo pairs and tri-stereos were acquired. The background image is a MODIS mosaic from the Blue Marble Next Generation project.
  • Table 1. Characteristics of the study sites and Pléiades images. For each site, the approximate geographic coordinates and maximum altitude (Zmax, m a.s.l.) are indicated. All images were acquired by Pléiades-1A, except a Pléiades-1B stereo pair over Tungnafellsjökull. The base-toheight ratio (B/H), the ratio of the distance between two successive positions of the satellite to its height above ground, is an indicator of the sensitivity to topography. A single B/H is indicated for stereo pairs, whereas three values for the front/nadir, nadir/back and front/back pairs are provided for tri-stereos. The percentage of saturation in the image is given for the front/back images for stereo pairs and front/nadir/back for tri-stereos. The reference (noted Ref.) altimetric data used to evaluate the Pléiades DEMs are kinematic global navigation satellite system (kGNSS), stop and go GNSS measurements and, for the Tungnafellsjökull Ice Cap only, a lidar DEM. Identification codes of the Pléiades images are not listed for the sake of concision.
  • Figure 2. Pléiades orthoimages for the five different study sites. Yellow dots locate the GNSS measurements used to evaluate the DEMs. For Tungnafellsjökull, the blue polygon marks the limits of the lidar DEM. For the Mont-Blanc area, the red rectangles separate two stereo pairs acquired the same day which are combined to cover the entire glacier complex. For Astrolabe Glacier, an enlargement of a 750 m by 600 m area in the upper part of the glacier (elevation of > 700 m above ellipsoid) is shown.
  • Table 2. Influence of different processing parameter settings on the coverage and accuracy of the Pléiades DEMs. Statistics for the elevation differences between the Pléiades and lidar DEMs are computed for ∼ 3 000 000 data points on the ice-free terrain around the Tungnafellsjökull ice cap (Iceland). The parameter settings tested are as follows: type of terrain is mountainous (Mtn) or flat, DEM detail is low or high, data gaps are filled or not filled. All Pléiades DEMs are computed using 5 GCPs and with a final pixel size of 4 m. The table provides the horizontal shifts of the Pléiades DEMs and, after horizontal co-registration (i.e. correction of the mean horizontal shift between the Pléiades and the lidar DEMs on the ice-free terrain), statistics (mean, median, SD and NMAD) of the elevation differences (dh, ZPléiades−Zlidar) outside the ice cap (OFF ice).
  • Table 3. Influence of the collection of ground control points (GCPs) and tie point (TPs) on the accuracy of the Pléiades DEMs. Statistics are computed for the elevation differences (dh) between the Pléiades and lidar DEMs around and on the Tungnafellsjökull ice cap (Iceland). The Pléiades DEMs are computed using different numbers of GCPs and TPs. The parameter settings used to generate all the DEMs are as follows: DEM detail is low, type of terrain is mountainous, pixel size is 4 m, data gaps are not filled. The number of pixels used in these statistics is over 3 000 000.
  • Figure 3. Map of the elevation differences between the lidar DEM (7–8 August 2011) and the Pléiades DEM (9 October 2013) of the Tungnafellsjökull Ice Cap. The margin of the ice cap is shown by a thick black line and snow patches are outlined with a thinner black line. On the ice cap, the elevation contour lines are drawn as thin dashed lines every 100 m (from 1000 to 1500 m a.s.l.). The study area has been divided into 3× 3 tiles in which the median of the elevation differences on the ice-free terrain only is reported (in metres). Background: Pléiades image (©CNES 2013, Distribution Airbus D & S).
  • Table 4. Statistics on the elevation differences between the Pléiades DEMs and the GNSS measurements for all study sites. When a tri-stereo was available, the statistics for the three different image combinations and for a merged DEM are given. For Agua Negra and Tungnafellsjökull, the statistics are also given separately on and off glaciers. The last column, N , indicates the number of points for which elevation differences are computed.
  • Figure 4. Comparison of the 21 August 2003 SPOT 5 and 19 August 2012 Pléiades DEMs of the accumulation basin of the Mer de Glace. The upper panels show the SPOT 5 data and the lower panels the Pléiades data. From left to right, the panels show successively the satellite images, the DEMs with the 50 m elevation contour lines and the shaded relief images derived from the DEMs. Note the higher percentage of data voids and artefacts in the SPOT 5 DEM.

References Powered by Scopus

A reconciled estimate of glacier contributions to sea level rise: 2003 to 2009

1057Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contrasting patterns of early twenty-first-century glacier mass change in the Himalayas

950Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A global assessment of the SRTM performance

902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century

565Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Massive collapse of two glaciers in western Tibet in 2016 after surge-like instability

249Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modelling the future evolution of glaciers in the European Alps under the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble

177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berthier, E., Vincent, C., Magnússon, E., Gunnlaugsson, P., Pitte, P., Le Meur, E., … Wagnon, P. (2014). Glacier topography and elevation changes derived from Pléiades sub-meter stereo images. Cryosphere, 8(6), 2275–2291. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2275-2014

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 77

57%

Researcher 47

35%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 91

65%

Environmental Science 29

21%

Engineering 18

13%

Computer Science 2

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0