Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil

25Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and deeper brain areas are limited. Resting motor thresholds of the left and right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA) were determined with the DC and the Fo8 coil in 17 healthy subjects. Coils were orientated over the corresponding motor area in an angle of 45 degrees for the hand area with the handle pointing in posterior direction and in medio-lateral direction for the leg area. Physical measurements were done with an automatic gantry table using a Gaussmeter. Resting motor threshold was higher for the leg area in contrast to the hand area and for the Fo8 in contrast to the DC coil. Muscle by coil interaction was also significant providing higher differences between leg and hand area for the Fo8 (about 27%) in contrast to the DC coil (about 15%). Magnetic field strength was higher for the DC coil in contrast to the Fo8 coil. The DC coil produces a higher magnetic field with higher depth of penetration than the figure of eight coil.

References Powered by Scopus

The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory

31020Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental Illness

996Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cingulate function in depression: A potential predictor of treatment response

972Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

TMS-induced silent periods: A review of methods and call for consistency

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated optimization of TMS coil placement for personalized functional network engagement

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on heart rate and heart rate variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schecklmann, M., Schmaußer, M., Klinger, F., Kreuzer, P. M., Krenkel, L., & Langguth, B. (2020). Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58034-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Researcher 3

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

41%

Neuroscience 5

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

18%

Psychology 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free