Modeling joint entity and relation extraction with table representation

344Citations
Citations of this article
295Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper proposes a history-based structured learning approach that jointly extracts entities and relations in a sentence. We introduce a novel simple and flexible table representation of entities and relations. We investigate several feature settings, search orders, and learning methods with inexact search on the table. The experimental results demonstrate that a joint learning approach significantly outperforms a pipeline approach by incorporating global features and by selecting appropriate learning methods and search orders.

References Powered by Scopus

A survey of named entity recognition and classification

2007Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition

1134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kernel Methods for Relation Extraction

921Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications

1503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

End-to-end relation extraction using LSTMs on sequences and tree structures

939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Joint extraction of entities and relations based on a novel tagging scheme

574Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miwa, M., & Sasaki, Y. (2014). Modeling joint entity and relation extraction with table representation. In EMNLP 2014 - 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 1858–1869). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1200

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 123

78%

Researcher 23

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 144

88%

Engineering 10

6%

Linguistics 7

4%

Social Sciences 3

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free