The diskmass survey. II. Error budget

75Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a performance analysis of the DiskMass Survey. The survey uses collisionless tracers in the form of disk stars to measure the surface density of spiral disks, to provide an absolute calibration of the stellar mass-to-light ratio (Y*), and to yield robust estimates of the dark-matter halo density profile in the inner regions of galaxies. We find that a disk inclination range of 25°35° is optimal for our measurements, consistent with our survey design to select nearly face-on galaxies. Uncertainties in disk scale heights are significant, but can be estimated from radial scale lengths to 25% now, and more precisely in the future. We detail the spectroscopic analysis used to derive line-of-sight velocity dispersions, precise at low surface-brightness, and accurate in the presence of composite stellar populations. Our methods take full advantage of large-grasp integral-field spectroscopy and an extensive library of observed stars. We show that the baryon-to-total mass fraction (Fbar) is not a well-defined observational quantity because it is coupled to the halo mass model. This remains true even when the disk mass is known and spatially extended rotation curves are available. In contrast, the fraction of the rotation speed supplied by the disk at 2.2 scale lengths (disk maximality) is a robust observational indicator of the baryonic disk contribution to the potential. We construct the error budget for the key quantities: dynamical disk mass surface density (∑dyn), disk stellar mass-to-light ratio (Y*disk), and disk maximality (Fdisk*,max ≡ Vdisk*,max/Vc). Random and systematic errors in these quantities for individual galaxies will be ∼25%, while survey precision for sample quartiles are reduced to 10%, largely devoid of systematic errors outside of distance uncertainties. © 2010 The American Astronomical Society.

References Powered by Scopus

An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges

2558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The sloan Digital Sky Survey photometric system

2438Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The star formation efficiency in nearby galaxies: Measuring where gas forms stars effectively

1586Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

SPARC: MASS MODELS for 175 DISK GALAXIES with SPITZER PHOTOMETRY and ACCURATE ROTATION CURVES

506Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

OBSERVING STRATEGY for the SDSS-IV/MaNGA IFU GALAXY SURVEY

318Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Galaxy disks

226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bershady, M. A., Verheijen, M. A. W., Westfall, K. B., Andersen, D. R., Swaters, R. A., & Martinsson, T. (2010). The diskmass survey. II. Error budget. Astrophysical Journal, 716(1), 234–268. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/234

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘21‘22‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Researcher 7

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 18

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0