Implicit gender-career bias in postgraduate medical training still exists, mainly in residents and in females

20Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: More and more female residents enter postgraduate medical training (PGMT). Meanwhile, women are still underrepresented in academic medicine, in leadership positions and in most surgical specialties. This suggests that female residents’ career development may still be negatively impacted by subtle, often unconscious stereotype associations regarding gender and career-ambition, called implicit gender-career bias. This study explored the existence and strength of implicit gender-career bias in doctors who currently work in PGMT, i.e. in attending physicians who act as clinical trainers and in their residents. Methods: We tested implicit gender-career bias in doctors working in PGMT by means of an online questionnaire and an online Implicit Association Test (IAT). We used standard IAT analysis to calculate participants’ IAT D scores, which indicate the direction and strength of bias. Linear regression analyses were used to test whether the strength of bias was related to gender, position (resident or clinical trainer) or specialty (non-surgical or surgical specialty). Results: The mean IAT D score among 403 participants significantly differed from zero (D-score = 0.36 (SD = 0.39), indicating bias associating male with career and female with family. Stronger gender-career bias was found in women (βfemale =0.11; CI 0.02; 0.19; p = 0.01) and in residents (βresident 0.12; CI 0.01; 0.23; p = 0.03). Conclusions: This study may provide a solid basis for explicitly addressing implicit gender-career bias in PGMT. The general understanding in the medical field is that gender bias is strongest among male doctors’ in male-dominated surgical specialties. Contrary to this view, this study demonstrated that the strongest bias is held by females themselves and by residents, independently of their specialty. Apparently, the influx of female doctors in the medical field has not yet reduced implicit gender-career bias in the next generation of doctors, i.e. in today’s residents, and in females.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test

8368Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes

4432Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm

4235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Gender differences in emergency medicine resident assessment: A scoping review

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How long will it take to reach the gender diversity goal for orthopaedics in Japan?

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kramer, M., Heyligers, I. C., & Könings, K. D. (2021). Implicit gender-career bias in postgraduate medical training still exists, mainly in residents and in females. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02694-9

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

66%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

17%

Researcher 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

17%

Social Sciences 4

11%

Psychology 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0