Impact of audit firm rotation on audit quality: Evidence from Bhutan

1Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research study examines the effects of audit firm rotation on audit quality for non-financial public listed companies in Bhutan. Currently, Bhutan has only 21 companies listed on the Royal Securities Exchange of Bhutan Limited (RSEBL). Secondary data obtained for the period of 10 years, between 2009 to 2018, were analyzed using regression analysis. Abnormal Working Capitals Accruals (AWCA) has been used as proxy for audit quality. The study concludes that audit firm rotation has an insignificant but positive relation with AWCA. Thus, in Bhutan audit firm rotation does not affect audit quality for non-financial public companies, which are in tune with prior studies. Further, it was observed that there is an insignificant relation between AWCA and all control variables with the exception of growth. Growth has a decreasing trend at the rate of-0.13 percent while the trend analysis of AWCA shows that audit quality of non-financial public listed companies has been increasing at the rate of 21.01 percent which is an indirect evidence of low audit quality.

References Powered by Scopus

Auditor size and audit quality

2814Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What do we know about audit quality?

694Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Audit partner tenure and audit quality

530Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Examining Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality in South Africa: Practitioner and Academic Perspectives

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, K. B., & Singh, A. (2019). Impact of audit firm rotation on audit quality: Evidence from Bhutan. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 3), 1410–1417. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1262.0782S319

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 5

42%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 6

55%

Engineering 2

18%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

18%

Chemistry 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free