Behind every innovative solution lies an obscure feature

8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Obscure Features Hypothesis (OFH) for innovation states that a two-step process undergirds almost all innovative solutions: (1) notice an infrequently observed or new (i.e., obscure) feature of the problem and (2) construct an interaction involving the obscure feature that produces the desired effects to solve the problem. The OFH leads to a systematic derivation of innovation-enhancing techniques by engaging in two tasks. First, we developed a 32-category system of the types of features possessable by a physical object or material. This Feature Type Taxonomy (FTT) provides a panoramic view of the space of features and assists in searches for the obscure ones. Second, we are articulating the many cognitive reasons that obscure features are overlooked and are developing countering techniques for each known reason. We present the implications and techniques of the OFH, as well as indicate how software can assist innovators in the effective use of these innovation-enhancing techniques.

References Powered by Scopus

WordNet: A Lexical Database for English

11660Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The associative basis of the creative process

2792Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design fixation

1134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An approach to human-machine collaboration in innovation

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Integrated Constraints in Creativity: Foundations for a Unifying Model

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of computational thinking (CT) in scratch fractal projects: Towards CT-HCI Scaffolds for Analogical-fractal Thinking

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCaffrey, T., & Spector, L. (2012). Behind every innovative solution lies an obscure feature. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 4(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2012.04.014

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

54%

Researcher 5

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 8

42%

Computer Science 4

21%

Social Sciences 4

21%

Engineering 3

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free