Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study

7Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study. Methods: A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August–September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors. Results: In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (<5 min), multidimensional and well-calibrated across the spectrum of frailty, reflecting baseline status 2–4 weeks before presentation. Screening should ideally be routine, prompt (<4 h after arrival) and completed at first contact in ED. Functional ability, mobility, cognition, medication use and social factors were identified as the most important variables to include. Conclusions: Although a clear consensus was reached on important requirements of frailty screening in ED, and variables to include in an ideal screen, more research is required to operationalise screening in clinical practice.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

113547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frailty in elderly people

6701Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies

2063Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Frailty screening in the Emergency Department: why does it matter?

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frailty-aware Care in the Emergency Department

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patterns of referral to interprofessional services among frail older adults presenting to emergency departments in Canada

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moloney, E., O’Donovan, M. R., Carpenter, C. R., Salvi, F., Dent, E., Mooijaart, S., … O’Caoimh, R. (2024). Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study. Age and Ageing, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae013

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

72%

Researcher 3

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

57%

Psychology 6

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

10%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 25

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free