Physicians’ self-assessed empathy levels do not correlate with patients’ assessments

46Citations
Citations of this article
171Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Empathy is a fundamental humanistic component of patient care which facilitates efficient and patient-centered clinical encounters. Despite being the principal recipient of physician empathy little work on how patients perceive/report receiving empathy from their physicians has been undertaken. In the context of doctor-patient interactions, knowledge about empathy has mostly originated from physicians’ perspectives and has been developed from studies using self-assessment instruments. In general, self-assessment may not correlate well with the reality observed by others. Objectives To investigate: 1—the relationship between physicians’ self-assessed empathy and patients’ measures of physicians’ empathy; 2 –Environmental factors that could influence patients’ perceptions; and 3 –the correlation between two widely used psychometric scales to measure empathy from the perspective of patients. Methods This is an observational study which enrolled 945 patients and 51 physicians from radiology, clinical, and surgical specialties. The physicians completed the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSE) and the International Reactivity Index (IRI), and patients completed the Consultation and Relational Empathy scale (CARE), and the Jefferson Scale of Patient’s Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE). Results We did not observe any significant correlation between total self-assessed empathy and patients’ perceptions. We observed a small correlation (r = 0,3, P<0,05) between the sub-dimension Perspective Taking-JSE and JSPPPE. JSPPPE and CARE had a positive and moderate correlation (0,56; p<0,001). Physicians’ gender and sector influenced the JSPPPE score. Sector, medical specialty and the nature of the appointment (initial versus subsequent) influenced the CARE measure. Conclusions The lack of correlation between self-assessed empathy levels and patients’ perceptions suggests patients be included in the process of empathy evaluation. Practice implications Training strategies aiming the development of empathy should include patients’ evaluations and perspectives.

Figures

  • Table 1. Descriptive and comparative statistics for physicians’ characteristics.
  • Fig 1. Patient´s flowchart.
  • Table 3. Fit indices for the CARE scale.
  • Table 4. Descriptive and comparative statistics for patient’s characteristics and measurements.

References Powered by Scopus

Back-translation for cross-cultural research

9697Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach

7061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review

1748Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Medical students’ empathy and attitudes towards professionalism: Relationship with personality, specialty preference and medical programme

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What is clinical empathy? Perspectives of community members, university students, cancer patients, and physicians

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investigating the relation between self-assessment and patients' assessments of physicians-in-training empathy: A multicentric, observational, cross-sectional study in three teaching hospitals in Brazil

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernardo, M. O., Cecílio-Fernandes, D., Costa, P., Quince, T. A., Costa, M. J., & Carvalho-Filho, M. A. (2018). Physicians’ self-assessed empathy levels do not correlate with patients’ assessments. PLoS ONE, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198488

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 55

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 16

18%

Researcher 16

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 38

46%

Psychology 18

22%

Social Sciences 17

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0