Determinants of Inappropriate Antibiotics Use in Rural Central Ghana Using a Mixed Methods Approach

42Citations
Citations of this article
193Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The consequences of antibiotic resistance are projected to be most severe in low and middle income countries with high infectious disease burden. This study examined determinants of inappropriate antibiotic use at the community level in rural Ghana. Methods: An observational study involving qualitative and quantitative methods was conducted between July, 2016 and September, 2018 in Ghana. Two household surveys were conducted at two time points (2017 and 2018) among 1,100 randomly selected households over 1 year. The surveys focused on antibiotic use episodes in the past month. Four in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions were performed to further explain the survey results. Determinants of inappropriate antibiotic use were assessed using a mixed effect logistic regression analysis (multilevel analysis) to account for the clustered nature of data. We defined inappropriate antibiotic use as either use without prescription, not completing treatment course or non-adherence to instruction for use. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Results: A total of 1,100 households was enrolled in which antibiotics were used in 585 (53.2%) households in the month prior to the surveys. A total of 676 (21.2%) participants out of 3,193 members from the 585 reportedly used antibiotics for 761 episodes of illness. Out of the 761 antibiotic use episodes, 659 (86.6%) were used inappropriately. Paying for healthcare without health insurance (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.10, 95% CI: 1.1–7.4, p-value: 0.026), not seeking healthcare from health centers (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2–5.0, p-value: 0.018), or pharmacies (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.7–13.0, p-value: 0.003) were significantly associated with inappropriate antibiotic use. Socio-demographic characteristics were not significantly associated with inappropriate antibiotic use. However, the qualitative study described the influence of cost of medicines on inappropriate antibiotic use. It also revealed that antibiotic users with low socioeconomic status purchased antibiotics in installments which, could facilitate inappropriate use. Conclusion: Inappropriate antibiotic use was high and influenced by out-of-pocket payment for healthcare, seeking healthcare outside health centers, pharmacies, and buying antibiotics in installments due to cost. To improve appropriate antibiotic use, there is the need for ministry of health and healthcare agencies in Ghana to enhance healthcare access and healthcare insurance, and to provide affordable antibiotics.

References Powered by Scopus

Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis

2365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Resistance to antibiotics: Are we in the post-antibiotic era?

1087Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-prescription antimicrobial use worldwide: A systematic review

636Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Community-based antibiotic access and use in six low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-method approach

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tackling antimicrobial resistance across sub-Saharan Africa: current challenges and implications for the future

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ongoing Efforts to Improve Antimicrobial Utilization in Hospitals among African Countries and Implications for the Future

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Afari-Asiedu, S., Oppong, F. B., Tostmann, A., Ali Abdulai, M., Boamah-Kaali, E., Gyaase, S., … Asante, K. P. (2020). Determinants of Inappropriate Antibiotics Use in Rural Central Ghana Using a Mixed Methods Approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00090

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

68%

Researcher 16

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 21

30%

Nursing and Health Professions 21

30%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

26%

Immunology and Microbiology 9

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 6
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 48

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0