Sleep assessment

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Sleep assessment is an important part of health evaluation. During the last several decades, our knowledge about sleep exponentially expanded, and many subjective and objective tools are now available for use. Many of the subjective tools initially were developed for research use; however, they are now used in clinical arena. Many of these tools or approaches are translated to many languages and are validated for use. In this chapter, with the help of experts in fields of pediatric and adult sleep medicine, we concisely review many tools that are in use. In this chapter, an extensive reference list is provided for the readers as space does not allow to extensively review each tool. The discussion about the tools is divided to sections according to what each tool is intended to measure. In contrast to subjective tools, objective tools require up-to-date medical equipment, properly trained technical staff, and experienced sleep professionals to provide the services. Advancement in technology has significantly facilitated use of sleep tools. Telehealth technologies specifically have improved access to sleep services for diagnosis and management of sleep disorders.

References Powered by Scopus

The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

25002Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The Epworth sleepiness scale

13554Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of the insomnia severity index as an outcome measure for insomnia research

5810Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khazaie, H., Sharafkhaneh, A., Hirshkowitz, M., Zakiei, A., & Gozal, D. (2023). Sleep assessment. In Sleep Medicine: A Comprehensive Guide for Transitioning Pediatric to Adult Care (pp. 45–67). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30010-3_4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 4

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

11%

Neuroscience 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free