Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields

906Citations
Citations of this article
1.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years there has been an outpouring of work at the intersection of social movement studies and organizational theory. While we are generally in sympathy with this work, we think it implies a far more radical rethinking of structure and agency in modern society than has been realized to date. In this article, we offer a brief sketch of a general theory of strategic action fields (SAFs). We begin with a discussion of the main elements of the theory, describe the broader environment in which any SAF is embedded, consider the dynamics of stability and change in SAFs, and end with a respectful critique of other contemporary perspectives on social structure and agency. © 2011 American Sociological Association.

References Powered by Scopus

Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment

6587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect

3957Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences

1365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Institutional complexity and organizational responses

2222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature

605Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementation, context and complexity

554Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 721

69%

Researcher 141

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 122

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 63

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 622

64%

Business, Management and Accounting 270

28%

Arts and Humanities 38

4%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free