A systematic review and meta-analysis of the acceptability and effectiveness of university smoke-free policies

64Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Systematically review studies of support for, and effectiveness of, university campuses smoke-free policies. Participants/Methods: A search was carried out for studies in English related to campus smoking bans through June 2013. Eligible studies had outcomes for student or faculty attitudes, or measures of smoking prevalence or secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Results: Nineteen eligible studies were identified, 18 from the United States and 1 from the United Kingdom. A meta-analysis found 58.94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [52.35%, 65.53%]) of students (12 studies) and 68.39% (95% CI [65.12%, 71.67%]) of faculty (7 studies) supported smoke-free policies. Both studies measuring student smoking prevalence indicated a postban reduction (16.5% to 12.8% after 1 year [p

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lupton, J. R., & Townsend, J. L. (2015, May 19). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the acceptability and effectiveness of university smoke-free policies. Journal of American College Health. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1015029

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

75%

Researcher 6

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 17

36%

Medicine and Dentistry 17

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

17%

Psychology 5

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free