The validity of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scales

290Citations
Citations of this article
292Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This introductory article addresses the question, 'Are the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales valid?' The initial evidence for the validity of the family of MHLC scales is reviewed, followed by a discussion of the empirical evidence for the hypothesis linking MHLC scale scores to measures of health behavior. There is ample evidence in the literature that the MHLC scales validly assess health locus of control beliefs. Nevertheless, caution should be used when making generalizations regarding the validity of the MHLC scales to new theoretical or situational contexts. The theoretical relationships between these beliefs and other constructs are complex, making it necessary to thoughtfully consider the valid application of the MHLC scales in each new study. Copyright © 2005 SAGE Publications.

References Powered by Scopus

Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales

2606Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients

666Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Form C of the MHLC Scales: A Condition-Specific Measure of Locus of Control

438Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The neurochemistry of music

613Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence

364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Religiousness/spirituality and health: A meaning systems perspective

307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallston, K. A. (2005, September). The validity of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scales. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305055304

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 115

61%

Researcher 25

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 24

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 23

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 90

49%

Medicine and Dentistry 46

25%

Social Sciences 27

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 22

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0