An ethical pathway for the use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Nursing Care

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Modern Medicine faces the challenge of acquiring, analyzing, and applying a great amount of data to solve a complex quantity of clinical problems. In this scenario, Artificial Intelligence technologies serve the developing of programs to help professionals diagnose, predict results, and make therapeutic decisions. The same as any technology applied to man, the use of Artificial Intelligence poses ethical questions. In this article the principal ethical problems related to the use of Artificial Intelligence technologies in Medicine are identified and a roadmap for reflection on the former from the praxis perspective is suggested. Nursing is no stranger to the revolutionary change brought about by the introduction of Artificial Intelligence in health care. The recent conclusions of the international think-tank on Artificial Intelligence and Nursing recognized the relevance of the use of these technologies to increase and extend the capabilities of Nursing, including care. Nursing practice raises the question about the impact of Artificial Intelligence technologies on the very essence of Nursing, that is, on the nurse-patient relationship by providing good care. From Nursing epistemology, it is to possible sketch out a pathway for reflection on the ethical problems raised by the use of Artificial Intelligence technologies.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
835Citations
1536Readers

This article is free to access.

Artificial intelligence in medicine

656Citations
1701Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paladino, M. S. (2023). An ethical pathway for the use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Nursing Care. Medicina e Morale, 72(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2023.1231

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 3

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 2

50%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0