Monetäre Bewertung von Ökosystemleistungen: Eine kritische Sicht auf einige Kritiken (Essay)

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Diverse objections against the monetary valuation of ecosystem services are being raised in transdisciplinary discussions as well as in the scientific literature. The monetary valuation is said to overlook nature's intrinsic values, to infringe ethical norms, to narrow down perspectives to economic welfare alone, or even to nothing but material well-being, to stimulate the commercialisation of nature - conversely, others criticize that it fails exactly in this respect -, to favour social inequality, and to rely upon undependable methods. This essay questions the cogency of these criticisms and highlights some prejudices and misconceptions, often rooted in an erroneous understanding of the function of environmental valuations in the political decision process.

References Powered by Scopus

Applied choice analysis: A primer

2721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selling out on nature

592Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services

462Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Restoration of Ecosystems - Bridging Nature and Humans: A Transdisciplinary Approach

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial distribution of forest ecosystem service benefits in Germany: A multiple Benefit-transfer model

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elsasser, P. (2017). Monetäre Bewertung von Ökosystemleistungen: Eine kritische Sicht auf einige Kritiken (Essay). Schweizerische Zeitschrift Fur Forstwesen. Schweizerischer Forstverein. https://doi.org/10.3188/szf.2017.0014

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 2

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free