Comparison of Knee Function and Activity Level Between Bilateral and Unilateral ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Group Analysis With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of knowledge regarding knee function and activity level after bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at midterm follow-up. Purpose: To compare activity level, patient-reported knee function, and quality of life in patients with bilateral ACLR and matched controls with unilateral ACLR at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with bilateral ACLR who were aged ≤40 years and had a second ACLR performed between 2010 and 2015 were identified in the authors’ local database. Surgical data and preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were extracted. The patients were sent a letter with questionnaires including the KOOS, EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D), and EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) and were asked study-specific questions by telephone regarding activity level and knee function at a minimum 5-year follow-up. For every patient with bilateral ACLR, a control matched for age ±2 years, sex, year ACLR was performed, and preinjury activity level or sport at the time of injury were identified in the database. Results: A total of 98 patients (mean age ± SD, 33.3 ± 7.3 years) with bilateral ACLR and 98 patients with unilateral ACLR (mean age ± SD, 33.1 ± 7.7 years) were included. The mean postoperative follow-up was 7.6 ± 1.8 years (from the second ACLR) for patients with bilateral ACLR and 7.8 ± 1.7 years for patients with unilateral ACLR. Patients with bilateral ACLR reported lower scores on all KOOS subscales, the EQ-5D, and the EQ-VAS at follow-up (P

References Powered by Scopus

The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies

6907Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group

4342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Development of a self-administered outcome measure

2984Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Patients who undergo bilateral medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction return to sport at a similar rate as those that undergo unilateral reconstruction

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Poorer patient-reported knee function and quality of life, but not activity level, after revision ACL reconstruction compared with primary ACL reconstruction: a matched-pair analysis with a minimum 5-year follow-up

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of the Swedish Knee Ligament Register: Concomitant injuries, revision surgery and smoking render worse results

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koca, F., Fältström, A., Cristiani, R., & Stålman, A. (2022). Comparison of Knee Function and Activity Level Between Bilateral and Unilateral ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Group Analysis With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221083576

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Researcher 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

44%

Sports and Recreations 3

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

22%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0