International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

842Citations
Citations of this article
1.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2013, consensus was obtained on a definition of bruxism as repetitive masticatory muscle activity characterised by clenching or grinding of the teeth and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible and specified as either sleep bruxism or awake bruxism. In addition, a grading system was proposed to determine the likelihood that a certain assessment of bruxism actually yields a valid outcome. This study discusses the need for an updated consensus and has the following aims: (i) to further clarify the 2013 definition and to develop separate definitions for sleep and awake bruxism; (ii) to determine whether bruxism is a disorder rather than a behaviour that can be a risk factor for certain clinical conditions; (iii) to re-examine the 2013 grading system; and (iv) to develop a research agenda. It was concluded that: (i) sleep and awake bruxism are masticatory muscle activities that occur during sleep (characterised as rhythmic or non-rhythmic) and wakefulness (characterised by repetitive or sustained tooth contact and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible), respectively; (ii) in otherwise healthy individuals, bruxism should not be considered as a disorder, but rather as a behaviour that can be a risk (and/or protective) factor for certain clinical consequences; (iii) both non-instrumental approaches (notably self-report) and instrumental approaches (notably electromyography) can be employed to assess bruxism; and (iv) standard cut-off points for establishing the presence or absence of bruxism should not be used in otherwise healthy individuals; rather, bruxism-related masticatory muscle activities should be assessed in the behaviour's continuum.

References Powered by Scopus

Ecological momentary assessment

4339Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Concept of Mental Disorder: On the Boundary Between Biological Facts and Social Values

1040Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bruxism defined and graded: An international consensus

837Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bruxism: An umbrella review of systematic reviews

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The bruxism construct: From cut-off points to a continuum spectrum

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB)—Overview and general remarks of a multidimensional bruxism evaluation system

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lobbezoo, F., Ahlberg, J., Raphael, K. G., Wetselaar, P., Glaros, A. G., Kato, T., … Manfredini, D. (2018, November 1). International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12663

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25080160240320

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 327

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 58

12%

Researcher 48

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 37

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 499

86%

Nursing and Health Professions 50

9%

Engineering 17

3%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 8
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 107

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0