Daylight luminance requirements for full-color, see-through, helmet-mounted display systems

  • Harding T
  • Rash C
10Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When color is implemented in helmet-mounted displays (HMDs) that are eyes-out, see-through displays, visual perception issues become an increased concern. A major confound with HMDs is their inherent see-through (transparent) property. The result is color in the displayed image that combines with color from the outside (or in-cockpit) world, producing an image with additive color. As luminance of the HMD imagery is reduced, the color separation between the HMD imagery and the background is also reduced. It is because of this additive effect that luminance contrast is so vitally important in developing HMD standards for color symbology. As a result, this paper identifies luminance requirements for full-color HMDs based upon two lines of investigation. The first is based on a study of white symbology against natural static backgrounds, where the quality of symbology was judged to be a function of not only the background luminance but also of the background complexity as well. The second is based on an evaluation of the complexity inherent in natural backgrounds and from this investigation, a predictive curve was found that describes the complexity of natural backgrounds as a function of ambient luminance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Figures

  • Fig. 1 Nine of the ten images used to evaluate the quality of overlaid symbology. The tenth image was a uniform field. Image from Harding et al.1
  • Table 1 Rating scale and description of ratings given to subjects in Harding et al.1
  • Fig. 2 Horizon 1 background image with (a) overlaid symbology and (b) block symbology image of same contrast. The average observer rating of the symbology in this image was 5.0, all characters could be seen with reduced contrast. With a display gamma of 2.2, the average Michaelson contrast was 0.41.
  • Fig. 3 (a) Gamma of Sony Trinitron monitor used in original study1. (b) Calculated visual contrast sensitivity as a function of four luminance levels, using the Barten model.5,6
  • Fig. 4 Scatter plot of patch analysis of each of the photos shown in Fig. 1. The solid curve is from Eq. (2). Image adapted from Harding et al.7
  • Fig. 5 Contrast plotted as a function of observer ratings for the 10 background images.1 The solid curves are power functions fit to the data.
  • Fig. 6 Contrast requirements as a function of BSD for observer ratings of 4, 5, and 6. Each set of data has 10 data points representing the 10 background images.1 The straight lines are linear fits to each of the observer ratings.
  • Fig. 7 Michaelson contrast calculations as a function of LB based on the envelope curve [Eq. (2)].

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text
23Citations
48Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harding, T. H., & Rash, C. E. (2017). Daylight luminance requirements for full-color, see-through, helmet-mounted display systems. Optical Engineering, 56(5), 051404. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.56.5.051404

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

53%

Researcher 5

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

36%

Neuroscience 3

27%

Computer Science 2

18%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0