Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Diabetes treatment is intended to maintain near-normal glycemic levels. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) allows patients to track their BG levels compared with glycemic targets and is associated with improved health outcomes. Because of the importance of SMBG, it is essential that results are accurate to prevent errors in nutritional intake and drug dosing. This study presents a new methodology to evaluate the accuracy of BG monitoring systems (BGMSs). Methods: Sensitivity analyses were performed using real and simulated BGMS data to compute probabilities that, for any BG value, the BGMS result would be within prescribed error bounds and confidence limits compared with laboratory reference values. Multiple BG value ranges were used. Results: Probability curves were created using data from 3 simulated BGMSs and anonymized data from 3 real-world BGMSs. Accuracy probability curves from capillary fingertip blood samples (actual clinical data) showed that all 3 real-world BGMSs met EN ISO 15197:2015 accuracy criteria, since 99.63%, 99.63%, and 99.81% of results from the 3 BGMSs were within ±15 mg/dL or ±15% of reference for BG <100 mg/dL and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively. However, there was identifiable variability between BGMSs if BG was <70 mg/dL; one BGMS showed further reductions in accuracy if BG was <50 mg/dL. Conclusions: Probability curves highlight the importance of BGMS accuracy to help achieve optimal glycemic control while avoiding hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. This may be especially significant in very low BG ranges where small errors in BGMS measurements can have substantial impacts on patient-related outcomes, including hypoglycemia risk.

References Powered by Scopus

Hypoglycaemia: The limiting factor in the glycaemic management of Type I and Type II diabetes

704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: The Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Registry

515Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: The Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP)

251Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Impact of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy on Clinical Decision Making for Diabetes Management

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current practice of blood glucose self-monitoring: the basis for effective control of diabetes mellitus

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient and glucometer: how can glucose self-monitoring be improved?

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pardo, S., Shaginian, R. M., & Simmons, D. A. (2018). Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(3), 650–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818762509

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

88%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Psychology 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0