The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students' ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation

204Citations
Citations of this article
549Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A 15-item two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument was developed to evaluate secondary students' ability to describe and explain seven types of chemical reactions using macroscopic, submicroscopic and symbolic representations. A mixed qualitative and quantitative case study was conducted over four years involving 787 Years 9 and 10 students (15 to 16 years old). The instrument was administered to sixty-five Year 9 students after nine months of instruction to evaluate their use of multiple levels of representation. Analysis of the students' responses demonstrated acceptable reliability of the instrument, a wide range of difficulty indices and acceptable discrimination indices for 12 of the items. The teaching program proved to be successful in that in most instances students were able to describe and explain the observed changes in terms of the atoms, molecules and ions that were involved in the chemical reactions using appropriate symbols, formulas, and chemical and ionic equations. Nevertheless, despite the emphasis on multiple levels of representation during instruction, 14 conceptions were identified that indicated confusion between macroscopic and submicroscopic representations, a tendency to extrapolate bulk macroscopic properties of substances to the submicroscopic level, and limited understanding of the symbolic representational system. © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

References Powered by Scopus

Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem

821Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students

674Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena

568Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry "triplet"

337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing and validating test items

313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students' misconceptions in science

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90006F

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 141

64%

Lecturer / Post doc 44

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 20

9%

Researcher 14

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 178

67%

Social Sciences 63

24%

Physics and Astronomy 15

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free