On event studies and distributed-lags in two-way fixed effects models: Identification, equivalence, and generalization

47Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We discuss three important properties of panel data event study designs. First, assuming constant treatment effects before and/or after some event time, also known as binning, is a natural restriction, which identifies dynamic treatment effects in the absence of never-treated units. Second, event study designs with binned endpoints and distributed-lag models are numerically identical. Third, classic dummy variable event study designs can be generalized to models that account for multiple treatments of different signs and varying intensities. We demonstrate the practical relevance of our methodological points in an application studying the effects of unemployment benefit duration on job search effort.

References Powered by Scopus

Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing

2509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods

2393Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

1724Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An Introductory Guide to Event Study Models

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The economic effects of international sanctions: An event study

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forecasts for a post-Roe America: The effects of increased travel distance on abortions and births

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmidheiny, K., & Siegloch, S. (2023). On event studies and distributed-lags in two-way fixed effects models: Identification, equivalence, and generalization. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 38(5), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2971

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 48

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

20%

Researcher 8

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 54

75%

Social Sciences 9

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 7

10%

Engineering 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free