Printed educational messages fail to increase use of thiazides as first-line medication for hypertension in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN72772651]

12Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Evidence on the effectiveness of printed educational messages in contributing to increasing evidence-based clinical practice is contradictory. Nonetheless, these messages flood physician offices, in an attempt to promote treatments that can reduce costs while improving patient outcomes. This study evaluated the ability of printed educational messages to promote the choice of thiazides as the first-line treatment for individuals newly diagnosed with hypertension, a practice supported by good evidence and included in guidelines, and one which could reduce costs to the health care system. Methods: The study uses a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (randomized by physician practice group). Setting: The setting involves all Ontario general/family practice physicians. Messages advising the use of thiazides as the first-line treatment of hypertension were mailed to each physician in conjunction with a widely read professional newsletter. Physicians were randomized to receive differing versions of printed educational messages: an "insert" (two-page evidence-based article) and/or one of two different versions of an "outsert" (short, directive message stapled to the outside of the newsletter). One outsert was developed without an explicit theory and one with messages developed targeting factors from the theory of planned behaviour or neither (newsletter only, with no mention of thiazides). The percentage of patients aged over 65 and newly diagnosed with hypertension who were prescribed a thiazide as the sole initial prescription medication. The effect of the intervention was estimated using a logistic regression model estimated using generalized estimating equation methods to account for the clustering of patients within physician practices. Results: Four thousand five hundred four physicians (with 23,508 patients) were randomized, providing 97 % power to detect a 5 % absolute increase in prescription of thiazides. No intervention effect was detected. Thiazides were prescribed to 27.6 % of the patients who saw control physicians, 27.4 % for the insert, 26.8 % for the outsert and 28.3 % of the patients who saw insert+outsert physicians, p=0.54. Conclusions: The study conclusively failed to demonstrate any impact of the printed educational messages on increasing prescribing of thiazide diuretics for first-line management of hypertension. Trial registration:ISRCTN72772651

References Powered by Scopus

The theory of planned behavior

59647Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT)

5356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies

2265Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

What theory, for whom and in which context? Reflections on the application of theory in the development and evaluation of complex population health interventions

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Randomized, controlled trials in health insurance systems

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zwarenstein, M., Grimshaw, J. M., Presseau, J., Francis, J. J., Godin, G., Johnston, M., … Hux, J. E. (2016). Printed educational messages fail to increase use of thiazides as first-line medication for hypertension in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN72772651]. Implementation Science, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0486-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

10%

Researcher 4

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 17

41%

Social Sciences 3

7%

Psychology 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free