Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices

1.0kCitations
Citations of this article
506Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In principle, quantum key distribution (QKD) offers information-theoretic security based on the laws of physics. In practice, however, the imperfections of realistic devices might introduce deviations from the idealized models used in security analyses. Can quantum code breakers successfully hack real systems by exploiting the side channels? Can quantum code makers design innovative countermeasures to foil quantum code breakers? Theoretical and experimental progress in the practical security aspects of quantum code making and quantum code breaking is reviewed. After numerous attempts, researchers now thoroughly understand and are able to manage the practical imperfections. Recent advances, such as the measurement-device-independent protocol, have closed critical side channels in the physical implementations, paving the way for secure QKD with realistic devices.

References Powered by Scopus

Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels

12132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor

5290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction

4545Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advances in quantum cryptography

1227Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres

670Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres

505Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H. K., & Pan, J. W. (2020). Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices. Reviews of Modern Physics, 92(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/REVMODPHYS.92.025002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 161

63%

Researcher 58

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 26

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 186

72%

Engineering 35

14%

Computer Science 29

11%

Materials Science 8

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free