A simple approach to distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed hydrology

311Citations
Citations of this article
531Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Impacts of climate change on watershed hydrology are subtle compared to cycles of drought and surplus precipitation (PPT), and difficult to separate from effects of land-use change. In the US Midwest, increasing baseflow has been more attributed to increased annual cropping than climate change. The agricultural changes have led to increased fertilizer use and nutrient losses, contributing to Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. In a 25-yr, small-watershed experiment in Iowa, when annual hydrologic budgets were accrued between droughts, a coupled water-energy budget (ecohydrologic) analysis showed effects of tillage and climate on hydrology could be distinguished. The fraction of PPT discharged increased with conservation tillage and time. However, unsatisfied evaporative demand (PET - Hargreaves method) increased under conservation tillage, but decreased with time. A conceptual model was developed and a similar analysis conducted on long-term (>1920s) records from four large, agricultural Midwest watersheds underlain by fine-grained tills. At least three of four watersheds showed decreases in PET, and increases in PPT, discharge, baseflow and PPT:PET ratios (p < 0.10). An analysis of covariance showed the fraction of precipitation discharged increased, while unsatisfied evaporative demand decreased with time among the four watersheds (p < 0.001). Within watersheds, agricultural changes were associated with ecohydrologic shifts that affected timing and significance, but not direction, of these trends. Thus, an ecohydrologic concept derived from small-watershed research, when regionally applied, suggests climate change has increased discharge from Midwest watersheds, especially since the 1970s. By inference, climate change has increased susceptibility of nutrients to water transport, exacerbating Gulf of Mexico hypoxia.

References Powered by Scopus

Climate change: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?

3468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis

1842Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

History and evaluation of hargreaves evapotranspiration equation

838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quantifying the relative contribution of the climate and direct human impacts on mean annual streamflow in the contiguous United States

505Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on baseflow hydrology in humid regions: A review

411Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distinguishing the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on variation of streamflow in the poyang lake catchment, china

409Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tomer, M. D., & Schilling, K. E. (2009). A simple approach to distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 376(1–2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.029

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 262

68%

Researcher 66

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 37

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 22

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 149

41%

Engineering 99

27%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 81

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free