Skip to main content
ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Why published research is untrustworthy

International Urogynecology Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1
6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

References Powered by Scopus

View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Why do ‘Trustworthy’ Living Systematic Reviews Matter?

Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy
6Citations
7Readers

This article is free to access.

View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lose, G., & Klarskov, N. (2017, September 1). Why published research is untrustworthy. International Urogynecology Journal. Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

31%

Researcher 3

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

25%

Physics and Astronomy 2

17%

Design 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 116

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0