Seasonal and interannual variation in evapotranspiration, energy balance and surface conductance in a northern temperate grassland

291Citations
Citations of this article
215Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The eddy covariance technique was used to measure evapotranspiration and sensible heat flux continuously for 2.5 years (three growing seasons) in a northern grassland near Lethbridge, Alta., Canada. The 1999 growing season had precipitation (226.9 mm) near the 30-year average value (1971-2000; 206.4 ± 77.5; mean ± S.D.). In contrast, the 1998 growing season precipitation (295.3 mm) was significantly above average and almost four times greater than the 2000 growing season precipitation (75.1 mm), which was significantly below average. The 1998 growing season had higher peak evapotranspiration (4.5 mm per day) than values observed in 1999 and 2000, when the highest evapotranspiration was approximately 3 mm per day. Evapotranspiration during the winter periods was normally <0.5 mm per day. In 1998, maximum latent heat flux was higher than sensible heat flux during June and early July. In contrast, sensible heat flux dominated the energy budget at midday during the entire 1999 and 2000 growing seasons. The soil heat flux component was quite similar during all 3 years, with maximum daily values reaching approximately 80-100 W m-2. The decoupling coefficient (ranged between 0.2 and 0.3) indicated that evapotranspiration was strongly controlled by surface conductance in this grassland. The highest λE/λEeq values (0.7-0.8) occurred in June and July 1998, before the exhaustion of soil moisture reduced values to <0.4 in late August. Lower values were recorded in 1999 and 2000, often below 0.5. A non-linear model of surface conductance that included functions for vapor pressure deficit, photon flux density, and available soil moisture explained a large proportion of the variation in the surface conductance data. To model surface conductance accurately, separate model coefficients need to be used for the different years. Therefore, our data indicate that evapotranspiration and its physiological control vary in response to interannual changes in precipitation. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO<inf>2</inf> assimilation in leaves of C<inf>3</inf> species

6973Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer

1775Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimates of the Annual Net Carbon and Water Exchange of Forests: The EUROFLUX Methodology

1652Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change

1888Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data

1411Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations

588Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wever, L. A., Flanagan, L. B., & Carlson, P. J. (2002). Seasonal and interannual variation in evapotranspiration, energy balance and surface conductance in a northern temperate grassland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 112(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00041-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 88

58%

Researcher 37

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 55

37%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42

28%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 41

28%

Engineering 10

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free