Partial least squares for discrimination

2.3kCitations
Citations of this article
1.6kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Partial least squares (PLS) was not originally designed as a tool for statistical discrimination. In spite of this, applied scientists routinely use PLS for classification and there is substantial empirical evidence to suggest that it performs well in that role. The interesting question is: why can a procedure that is principally designed for overdetermined regression problems locate and emphasize group structure? Using PLS in this manner has heurestic support owing to the relationship between PLS and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and the relationship, in turn, between CCA and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). This paper replaces the heuristics with a formal statistical explanation. As a consequence, it will become clear that PLS is to be preferred over PCA when discrimination is the goal and dimension reduction is needed. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial

6333Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools

1767Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition

1704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Building predictive models in R using the caret package

6406Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applied predictive modeling

5000Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling

2901Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barker, M., & Rayens, W. (2003). Partial least squares for discrimination. Journal of Chemometrics, 17(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.785

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 736

66%

Researcher 251

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 104

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 28

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 273

37%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 234

32%

Engineering 136

18%

Computer Science 98

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 3
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free