Cross-mapping of results and Nursing Interventions: contribution to the practice

10Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, through cross-mapping, the correspondence of the expected results and prescriptions written by nurses among those contained in the Interventions Classifications and Nursing Results, for the diagnosis "Ineffective peripheral tissue perfusion". METHOD: Descriptive study, using the case study and the mapping. The content of the case study was validated, with a rate of 93.75%. In the mapping of the statements of the nursing phenomena, written by the participants with the standardized language systems, a concordance index of 100% and 90% was obtained. RESULTS: Three statements of expected results and 19 prescribed care were analyzed. Of these, four presented correspondences with the classification of results and the same number with the classification of the interventions. CONCLUSION: The mapping allowed the correspondence of the terms adopted by the nurses with the standardized language systems and showed a didactic material to verify the pertinence of the decision making.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Validation of Nursing Diagnoses for people with chronic kidney conditions on conservative treatment

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of the Results of Manual and Automated Processes of Cross-Mapping Between Nursing Terms: Quantitative Study

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cross-mapping of nursing diagnoses and interventions in decompensated heart failure

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morais, S. C. R. V., Nóbrega, M. M. L. da, & Carvalho, E. C. de. (2018). Cross-mapping of results and Nursing Interventions: contribution to the practice. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 71(4), 1883–1890. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0324

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 9

75%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

8%

Computer Science 1

8%

Chemistry 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0