Assessment of Students Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Prompting Strategies and Prompt Engineering in Chemistry Education

20Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into educational settings prompts an urgent examination of its efficacy and the strategies that students employ to harness its potential. This study focuses on preservice chemistry teachers use of generative AI for chemistry-specific problem-solving and task completion. We found that there is a prevalent reliance on copy-pasting tactics in initial prompting approaches, and students need guidance to improve their prompting abilities. By implementing the “Five S” prompting framework, we explore the evolution of student prompts and the resultant satisfaction with AI-generated responses. Our findings indicate that, while students initially struggle with the nuances of effective prompting, the adoption of structured frameworks significantly enhances their perceived quality of AI-generated answers. This research sheds light on the current state of AI use among students but also underscores the importance of targeted educational frameworks to refine AI interaction in academic contexts. In particular, we suggest critical engagement and methodological prompt engineering strategies to maximize the educational benefits of generative AI technologies.

References Powered by Scopus

Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing

2091Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

1966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models

1774Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Let Us Not Squander the Affordances of LLMs for the Sake of Expedience: Using Retrieval Augmented Generative AI Chatbots to Support and Evaluate Student Reasoning

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Students’ Response to ChatGPT: An Adaptive Technology-To-Performance Model

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Dawn of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Chemistry Education

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tassoti, S. (2024). Assessment of Students Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Prompting Strategies and Prompt Engineering in Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(6), 2475–2482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00212

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

54%

Researcher 6

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 24

57%

Social Sciences 8

19%

Computer Science 7

17%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free