Kesetaraan Gender dalam Pandangan Amina Wadud dan Riffat Hassan

  • Mutrofin M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article will explore the similarities and differences between women with conceptually men voiced by Amina Wadud and Riffat Hasan. An important point that can be drawn from this is Amina Wadud thinking that he wants to dismantle the old thinking or even myths caused by biased interpreta-tion of the reconstruction methodology patriarchy through his commentary. Because it is not really in line with the basic principles and spirit of the Qur’ân. The Qur’ân actually very fair in the seated men and women. It’s just that this has become distorted by the presence of a biased interpretation of patriarchy, the more reinforced by the political system and society is very patriarchal. While Riffat Hassan argues that religious texts produced scientists and theologians influenced by a proven classic patriarchal culture. This then led to the emergence of theological arguments were dug from the Qur’ân as the primary text of Islam called feminist theology.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mutrofin, M. (2015). Kesetaraan Gender dalam Pandangan Amina Wadud dan Riffat Hassan. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 234. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2013.3.1.234-266

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

45%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 13

48%

Social Sciences 9

33%

Philosophy 3

11%

Design 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free