Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience

2.3kCitations
Citations of this article
3.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A fundamental challenge for systems neuroscience is to quantitatively relate its three major branches of research: brain-activity measurement, behavioral measurement, and computational modeling. Using measured brain-activity patterns to evaluate computational network models is complicated by the need to define the correspondency between the units of the model and the channels of the brain-activity data, e.g., single-cell recordings or voxels from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Similar correspondency problems complicate relating activity patterns between different modalities of brain-activity measurement (e.g., fMRI and invasive or scalp electrophysiology), and between subjects and species. In order to bridge these divides, we suggest abstracting from the activity patterns themselves and computing representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs), which characterize the information carried by a given representation in a brain or model. Building on a rich psychological and mathematical literature on similarity analysis, we propose a new experimental and data-analytical framework called representational similarity analysis (RSA), in which multi-channel measures of neural activity are quantitatively related to each other and to computational theory and behavior by comparing RDMs. We demonstrate RSA by relating representations of visual objects as measured with fMRI in early visual cortex and the fusiform face area to computational models spanning a wide range of complexities. The RDMs are simultaneously related via second-level application of multidimensional scaling and tested using randomization and bootstrap techniques. We discuss the broad potential of RSA, including novel approaches to experimental design, and argue that these ideas, which have deep roots in psychology and neuroscience, will allow the integrated quantitative analysis of data from all three branches, thus contributing to a more unified systems neuroscience. © 2008 Kriegeskorte, Mur and Bandettini.

References Powered by Scopus

Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding

13194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction

11581Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach

8597Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Building machines that learn and think like people

1493Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control

1185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey

934Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kriegeskorte, N., Mur, M., & Bandettini, P. (2008). Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2(NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250150300450600

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1568

65%

Researcher 581

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 228

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 51

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 989

47%

Neuroscience 708

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 251

12%

Computer Science 173

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 13
News Mentions: 3
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0