Phage-encoded anti-CRISPR defenses

107Citations
Citations of this article
237Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The battle for survival between bacteria and bacteriophages (phages) is an arms race where bacteria develop defenses to protect themselves from phages and phages evolve counterstrategies to bypass these defenses. CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems represent a widespread mechanism by which bacteria protect themselves from phage infection. In response to CRISPR-Cas, phages have evolved protein inhibitors known as anti-CRISPRs. Here, we describe the discovery and mechanisms of action of anti-CRISPR proteins. We discuss the potential impact of anti-CRISPRs on bacterial evolution, speculate on their evolutionary origins, and contemplate the possible next steps in the CRISPR-Cas evolutionary arms race. We also touch on the impact of anti-CRISPRs on the development of CRISPR-Cas-based biotechnological tools.

References Powered by Scopus

A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity

12595Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes

4814Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-γuided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression

3829Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics

596Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anti-CRISPR protein applications: natural brakes for CRISPR-Cas technologies

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mechanisms and clinical importance of bacteriophage resistance

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stanley, S. Y., & Maxwell, K. L. (2018, November 23). Phage-encoded anti-CRISPR defenses. Annual Review of Genetics. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120417-031321

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 82

68%

Researcher 27

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 89

62%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29

20%

Immunology and Microbiology 21

15%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0