Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community-based participatory research

135Citations
Citations of this article
393Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article describes a mixed methods study of community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership practices and the links between these practices and changes in health status and disparities outcomes. Directed by a CBPR conceptual model and grounded in indigenous-transformative theory, our nation-wide, cross-site study showcases the value of a mixed methods approach for better understanding the complexity of CBPR partnerships across diverse community and research contexts. The article then provides examples of how an iterative, integrated approach to our mixed methods analysis yielded enriched understandings of two key constructs of the model: trust and governance. Implications and lessons learned while using mixed methods to study CBPR are provided.

References Powered by Scopus

6998Citations
5002Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lucero, J., Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Alegria, M., Greene-Moton, E., Israel, B., … White Hat, E. R. (2018). Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community-based participatory research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816633309

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 170

63%

Researcher 39

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 36

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 25

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 93

54%

Nursing and Health Professions 29

17%

Psychology 26

15%

Business, Management and Accounting 24

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0