Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The hypofractionated radiotherapy modality was established to reduce treatment durations and enhance therapeutic efficiency, as compared to conventional fractionation treatment. However, this modality is challenging because of rigid dosimetric constraints. This study aimed to assess the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) widths (10 mm and 5 mm) on plan quality during the treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, this study aimed to investigate the impact of the MLC mode of energy on the Agility flattening filter (FF), MLC Agility-free flattening filter (FFF), and MLCi2 for patients receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy. Two radiotherapy techniques; Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT), were used in this research. In the present study, computed tomography simulations of ten patients (six plans per patient) with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were analyzed. Various dosimetric parameters were assessed, including monitor units, treatment delivery times, conformity, and homogeneity indices. To evaluate the plan quality, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were estimated for each technique. The results demonstrated that the determined dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV)p (such as D mean, conformity, and homogeneity index) showed greater improvement with MLC Agility FF and MLC Agility FFF than with MLCi2. Additionally, the treatment delivery time was reduced in the MLC Agility FF (by 31%) and MLC Agility FFF (by 10.8%) groups compared to the MLCi2 group. It is concluded that for both the VMAT and IMRT techniques, the smaller width (5 mm) MLCs revealed better planning target volume coverage, improved the dosimetric parameters for PTV, reduced the treatment time, and met the constraints for OARs. It is therefore recommended to use 5 mm MLCs for hypofractionated prostate cancer treatment due to better target coverage and better protection of OARs.

References Powered by Scopus

Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiation therapy: A radiation therapy oncology group consensus panel atlas

450Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report

324Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Reduces Radiation-Induced Morbidity and Improves Health-Related Quality of Life: Results of a Nonrandomized Prospective Study Using a Standardized Follow-Up Program

272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Gastrointestinal/genitourinary adverse event after intensity modulated versus three-dimensional primary radiation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dosimetric comparison of VMAT plans in preoperative short-course rectal radiotherapy

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Safety and tolerability of biodegradable balloon spacers in patients undergoing radiotherapy for organ-confined prostate cancer

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fathy, M. M., Hassan, B. Z., El-Gebaly, R. H., & Mokhtar, M. H. (2023). Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 62(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 3

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

67%

Physics and Astronomy 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free