Con: Cautionary tales and reservations about the adoption of new technologies and biomarkers for the management of acute kidney injury

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important health-care problem. Over the last decades, many innovative therapies and diagnostic approaches have been tried; however, none of these has been able to confirm consistently that they lead to improved outcomes. Much focus has been placed on intensive care unit (ICU)-associated AKI, whereas the bulk of AKI still concerns patients not in the ICU. Involvement of nephrologists in the care of AKI patients is necessary to further improve outcomes. It is unclear whether new technologies, such as biomarkers, are helpful and could replace nephrology consultation.

References Powered by Scopus

Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: The elain randomized clinical trial

862Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit

841Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute kidney injury: An increasing global concern

794Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of the Renal Angina Index in Determining Acute Kidney Injury

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Utilities of traditional and novel biomarkers in the management of acute kidney injury

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Biesen, W. (2017). Con: Cautionary tales and reservations about the adoption of new technologies and biomarkers for the management of acute kidney injury. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 32(3), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx017

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

58%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

17%

Decision Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0