PReventing early unplanned hOspital readmission after critical ILlnEss (PROFILE): Protocol and analysis framework for a mixed methods study

14Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Survivors of critical illness experience multidimensional disabilities that reduce quality of life, and 25-30% require unplanned hospital readmission within 3 months following index hospitalisation. We aim to understand factors associated with unplanned readmission; develop a risk model to identify intensive care unit (ICU) survivors at highest readmission risk; understand the modifiable and non-modifiable readmission drivers; and develop a risk assessment tool for identifying patients and areas for early intervention. Methods and analysis: We will use mixed methods with concurrent data collection. Quantitative data will comprise linked healthcare records for adult Scottish residents requiring ICU admission (1 January 2000-31 December 2013) who survived to hospital discharge. The outcome will be unplanned emergency readmission within 90 days of index hospital discharge. Exposures will include pre-ICU demographic data, comorbidities and health status, and critical illness variables representing illness severity. Regression analyses will be used to identify factors associated with increased readmission risk, and to develop and validate a risk prediction model. Qualitative data will comprise recorded/transcribed interviews with up to 60 patients and carers recently experiencing unplanned readmissions in three health board regions. A deductive and inductive thematic analysis will be used to identify factors contributing to readmissions and how they may interact. Through iterative triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop a construct/ taxonomy that captures reasons and drivers for unplanned readmission. We will validate and further refine this in focus groups with patients/carers who experienced readmissions in six Scottish health board regions, and in consultation with an independent expert group. A tool will be developed to screen for ICU survivors at risk of readmission and inform anticipatory interventions. Ethics and dissemination: Data linkage has approval but does not require ethical approval. The qualitative study has ethical approval. Dissemination with key healthcare stakeholders and policymakers is planned.

Figures

  • Figure 1 Conceptual framework for the range of factors that may contribute to unplanned hospital readmission following hospitalisation with an episode of critical illness. ICU, intensive care unit.
  • Figure 2 Flow diagram illustrating the overall structure of the PROFILE study. PROFILE, PReventing early unplanned hOspital readmission aFter critical ILlnEss.
  • Table 1 Items that patients and carers are asked to rank in importance to assist interpretation of their experience

References Powered by Scopus

The MOS social support survey

5142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness

2009Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis

1899Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Unplanned early hospital readmission among critical care survivors: A mixed methods study of patients and carers

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting risk of unplanned hospital readmission in survivors of critical illness: a population-level cohort study

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Polypharmacy and emergency readmission to hospital after critical illness: a population-level cohort study

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walsh, T. S., Salisbury, L., Donaghy, E., Ramsay, P., Lee, R., Rattray, J., & Lone, N. (2016). PReventing early unplanned hOspital readmission after critical ILlnEss (PROFILE): Protocol and analysis framework for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012590

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

65%

Researcher 14

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 38

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 24

35%

Social Sciences 3

4%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0