ESTIMATING CHARACTER WEIGHTS DURING TREE SEARCH

1.1kCitations
Citations of this article
325Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract— A new method for weighting characters according to their homoplasy is proposed; the method is non‐iterative and does not require independent estimations of weights. It is based on searching trees with maximum total fit, with character fits defined as a concave function of homoplasy. Then, when comparing trees, differences in steps occurring in characters which show more homoplasy on the trees are less influential. The reliability of the characters is estimated, during the analysis, as a logical implication of the trees being compared. The “fittest” trees imply that the characters are maximally reliable and, given character conflict, have fewer steps for the characters which fit the tree better. If other trees save steps in some characters, it will be at the expense of gaining them in characters with less homoplasy. Copyright © 1993, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

References Powered by Scopus

Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans

2718Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX

1441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A successive approximations approach to character weighting

1031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis

4699Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY

2663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics

1910Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goloboff, P. A. (1993). ESTIMATING CHARACTER WEIGHTS DURING TREE SEARCH. Cladistics, 9(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00209.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 129

58%

Researcher 61

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 27

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 201

78%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 34

13%

Environmental Science 12

5%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free