Regression kriging for improving crop height models fusing ultra-sonic sensing with UAV imagery

32Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A crop height model (CHM) can be an important element of the decision making process in agriculture, because it relates well with many agronomic parameters, e.g., crop height, plant biomass or crop yield. Today, CHMs can be inexpensively obtained from overlapping imagery captured from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms or from proximal sensors attached to ground-based vehicles used for regular management. Both approaches have their limitations and combining them with a data fusion may overcome some of these limitations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate if regression kriging, as a geostatistical data fusion approach, can be used to improve the interpolation of ground-based ultrasonic measurements with UAV imagery as covariate. Regression kriging might be suitable because we have a sparse data set (ultrasound) and an exhaustive data set (UAV) and both data sets have favorable properties for geostatistical analysis. To confirm this, we conducted four missions in two different fields in total, where we collected UAV imagery and ultrasonic data alongside. From the overlapping UAV images, surface models and ortho-images were generated with photogrammetric processing. The maps generated by regression kriging were of much higher detail than the smooth maps generated by ordinary kriging, because regression kriging ensures that for each prediction point information from the UAV, imagery is given. The relationship with crop height, fresh biomass and, to a lesser extent, with crop yield, was stronger using CHMs generated by regression kriging than by ordinary kriging. The use of UAV data from the prior mission was also of benefit and could improve map accuracy and quality. Thus, regression kriging is a flexible approach for the integration of UAV imagery with ground-based sensor data, with benefits for precision agriculture-oriented farmers and agricultural service providers.

Figures

  • Figure 1. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) crop height models superimposed with the ultrasonic (ULS) sensing measurements for Missions 1 and 2 (a,b) of field A.
  • Figure 2. The UAV crop height models superimposed with the ULS measurements for Missions 1 and 2 (a,b) of field B.
  • Table 1. Linear relationship and root mean square error (RMSE) of ULS measurements and UAV data (crop height model (CHM), orthoimage (ortho)) with crop height and fresh biomass (FM). Autocorrelation range and nugget-to-sill ratio (NSR) of the semivariograms for ULS measurements and UAV data (CHM, ortho).
  • Table 2. Comparison between ordinary kriging (without covariate) and regression kriging with UAV-CHM and UAV-ortho as covariate for estimating crop height and FM. Autocorrelation range and NSR of the corresponding residual semivariograms of the models.
  • Figure 3. Scatter plots between crop height manual measurements and the ULS-CHM values interpolated by ordinary kriging for field A and B (a,d) and regression kriging with UAV-CHM (b,e) and UAV-ortho (c,f) for fields A and B.
  • Figure 4. Ordinary kriging and regression kriging-interpolated ULS-CHMs for Mission 1 (a,b) and Mission 2 (c,d) using the UAV-CHM as covariate, as well as (e) the regression kriging interpolated ULS-CHM of Mission 2, using the UAV-CHM from Mission 1 as covariate for field A.
  • Figure 5. With ordinary kriging and regression kriging interpolated ULS-CHMs for Mission 1 (a,b) and Mission 2 (c,d) using the UAV-CHM as covariate as well as (e) the regression kriging interpolated ULS-CHM of Mission 2 with using the UAV-CHM from Mission 1 as covariate for field B.
  • Figure 6. Scatter plots and correlation (Spearman rank) between crop yield and ordinary kriging (a,d) and regression kriging with UAV-CHM (b,e) and UAV-ortho (c,f) as covariate for field A. For (g,h), the UAV-CHM and UAV-ortho of the prior to Mission 1 was used.

References Powered by Scopus

Multivariable geostatistics in S: The gstat package

2258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review

1478Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones

1080Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Smart Farming in Europe

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating above-ground biomass of maize using features derived from UAV-based RGB imagery

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimation of grassland canopy height and aboveground biomass at the quadrat scale using unmanned aerial vehicle

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schirrmann, M., Hamdorf, A., Giebel, A., Gleiniger, F., Pflanz, M., & Dammer, K. H. (2017). Regression kriging for improving crop height models fusing ultra-sonic sensing with UAV imagery. Remote Sensing, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070665

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

64%

Researcher 9

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15

42%

Engineering 8

22%

Environmental Science 8

22%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0