Relative contribution of envelope and fine structure to the subcortical encoding of noise-degraded speech

  • Bidelman G
13Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Brainstem frequency-following responses (FFR) were elicited to the speech token /ama/ in noise containing only envelope (ENV) or fine structure (TFS) cues to assess the relative contribution of these temporal features to the neural encoding of degraded speech. Successive cue removal weakened FFRs with noise having the most deleterious effect on TFS coding. Neuro-acoustic and response-to-response correlations revealed speech-FFRs are dominated by stimulus ENV for clean speech, with TFS making a stronger contribution in moderate noise levels. Results suggest that the relative weighting of temporal ENV and TFS cues to the neural transcription of speech depends critically on the degree of noise in the soundscape.

References Powered by Scopus

Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues

2423Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects.

899Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception

714Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bidelman, G. M. (2016). Relative contribution of envelope and fine structure to the subcortical encoding of noise-degraded speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(4), EL358–EL363. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4965248

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

74%

Researcher 4

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 9

41%

Psychology 6

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

23%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free